Abstract:
Reconciliation is a more forward-looking process of healing divisions between and within
communities. It requires recognition of others’ grievances and experiences and changes in policies that may have worsened the conflict or prevented greater cohesion. In the history of ethnic conflict in Sri Lanka, ethnicization of politics and politicization of ethnicity have become very common.
The politicization of ethnic and religious revivalism as also assertion of various ethnic and regional identities is posing serious problems for the integrity of Sri Lanka. Post-colonial Sri Lanka followed strategies of modernity and economic progress. However, the modernization and development process led to the centralization of development progress. The negative connotation of such centralization was the manifestation of discriminatory attitudes in terms of ethnicities and region. Discriminatory distribution of rights and privileges together with the arbitrary attitude of power elites led to a feeling of deprivation among minority ethnic groups. The Sinhala elites largely failed
to strengthen the democratic institutions by decentralizing political economic power. Instead, they responded by strengthening and using coercive powers to preserve regime interests against minorities which paved the way for a civil war. Four years since the end of civil war against
the Liberation Tigers of Tamil Eelam (LTTE), Sri Lanka is farther from reconciliation than ever.
Devolution of power to the north and east is essential to for sustainable peace. It has become
no less urgent with the defeat of the LTTE; indeed, the end of the war and the return of normalcy
in those areas make real power sharing all the more important. In this context, the government
has essentially rejected the need for any political solution or power sharing with the Tamilspeaking-majority
in North and East under the 13th amendment. This is a remarkable change from
previous governments. The current chaos on devolution creates uncertainty and, therefore, it is difficult to outline the future moves of the present government. But despite such problems,
prospects for reconciliation through devolution should remain hopeful.
This study focuses on the current crisis of the 13th amendment of the constitution
of the Sri Lanka. The prime objective of this study is to critically analyze the ongoing debates over
the devolution of powers to minority under the 13th amendment. The fundamental questions
of this research are the following: why does the present government deny provision of a reasonable devolution of power to minorities and its impact on reconciliation among the multi-ethnic society of Sri Lanka.This research is a critical one based one interpretive analysis in which both quantitativeand qualitative data have been used. Here, the stated purpose is being examined by studying bothprimary and secondary materials. This secondary data have been collected from books, reports,journals, news papers, official documents and research articles
