SEUIR Repository

Efficient type of steam condenser for water desalination of solar thermal energy in remote arid areas and islands

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author Kumara, P.D.C.
dc.contributor.author Suraweera, S.K.K.
dc.contributor.author Jayaweera, H.H.E
dc.contributor.author Muzathik, A.M.
dc.contributor.author Ariyaratne, T. R.
dc.date.accessioned 2017-04-22T09:57:15Z
dc.date.available 2017-04-22T09:57:15Z
dc.date.issued 2016-03
dc.identifier.citation International Journal of Energy Engineering, 6(1); 13-18. en_US
dc.identifier.issn 2225-6563
dc.identifier.uri http://ir.lib.seu.ac.lk/handle/123456789/2499
dc.description.abstract Comparison of material usage and cost of two types of cross-flow steam condensers is reported in this study which can be used for water desalination in conjunction with a parabolic trough solar energy concentrator plant. Traditional shell and tube condensers (where steam flows inside the tubes) and surface condensers (where steam flows in the shell and cooling water flows in the tubes) are considered in this study. It has been found that the energy production from the PTC of dimensions 4.5 m × 4.8 m with an aperture area of 21.6 m2 was 19.4 kW. It has been calculated that the distilled water production capacity of the solar energy harnessing system per day is 55.6 l, assuming solar irradiance to be 0.9 kW m-2 and the efficiency of solar energy harnessing system as 50% if the sun is available for four hours. The cooling water input temperature was assumed to be 30 °C. The minimum length required for a SS 304 tube of Ø 9.5 mm was 7.16 m for the traditional condenser and 1.30 m for the surface condenser. The efficiency of the traditional condenser reduced due to the formation of a condensed water layer on the surface of the tube, as it acts as a thermal barrier. However, in the surface condenser, efficiency was enhanced due to easy condensation while increasing the system pressure. Further, efficiency is enhanced due to density separation of wet vapour by changing the flow direction near the wet sump. Fabrication cost and maintenance cost are also found to be less in the surface condenser. As such, it can be concluded that use of surface condenser is the most cost effective method, which uses a smaller amount of material making the condenser smaller and lighter. en_US
dc.language.iso en_US en_US
dc.publisher World Academic Publishing en_US
dc.subject Heat exchanger en_US
dc.subject Parabolic trough concentrator en_US
dc.subject Steam condenser en_US
dc.subject Steam condensing methods en_US
dc.subject Surface condensation en_US
dc.subject Water desalination en_US
dc.title Efficient type of steam condenser for water desalination of solar thermal energy in remote arid areas and islands en_US
dc.type Article en_US


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

  • Research Articles [923]
    THESE ARE RESEARCH ARTICLES OF ACADEMIC STAFF, PUBLISHED IN JOURNALS AND PROCEEDINGS ELSWHERE

Show simple item record

Search SEUIR


Advanced Search

Browse

My Account