Abstract:
The informal Sector is an important segment of the economy and the world labour
nuirkel, Sri Lanka is also depending on the informal sector and marks around 59.5% of
the total population (2014, Sri Lanka Labour Force Survey Annual Report). It’s
observed that in most of the developing countries that three out of five small businesses
fail within the first few months of operation (Michael., Makarius., & Samuel., 2009).
Ity understanding the apprehensions related to informal sector employment in conflicted areas of Sri Lanka using Vavuniya District women-headed households,
recommending policy changes to enhance its contribution to the district labour force, and
{o increase their livelihoods and eventually contribute to the Local Economic
| development has been the major drivers of the study.
The study was conducted in two stages while stage one has been an exploratory
qualitative study that focused on identifying success factors, hindering factors, and
factors that should be improved, which identified all possible factors influencing the
performance of the informal sector. The literature also reviewed and compared with the
initial findings. And it further narrowed down the major factors influencing the stage
two study. And this was carried out by testing the hypotheses developed for this study
using a sample size of 300 women-headed households selected through stratified
random sampling and a descriptive, analytical and quantitative study were used.
Based on the study at stage one a questionnaire was developed and validated using
reliability and validity testing. A factor analysis was carried out to extract the valid
factors. As a result, four variables were identified namely training, economic, social
, and educational factors. Alpha values of the variables ranged from 0.70 to 0.97 which
explained excellent reliability or high reliability of the factors. To understand the
definite influence of these factors on the performance of the informal sector, regression and
correlation analysis were carried out at stage two.
While considering the correlation between performance and the four factors, the r
values between training and performance were 0.845, economic and performance was
0.89, social and performance was 0.841, and education and performance was 0.89
which explains a positive strong correlation.
Results of the regression analysis revealed that training accounted for 71%, while
economic factors 13%, social factors covered 4% and education resulted in an
additional 0.5% which means 88.5% of the variance performance of the informal sector
was ‘explained by these four factors. Through this the following equation for the model
was developed as, P = 0.103 + 0.139 (TS) + 0.395 (E) + 0.283 (S) + 0.204 (ED). The
factors are positively correlated with the performance of the informal sector among women
headed households in the district of Vavuniya in Sri Lanka (Adjusted R Square = 88.8
p=0.00)