SEUIR Repository

Bird counts in California’s central valley Wetlands using object-based image analysis

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author Fisher, J.
dc.contributor.author Marlin, K.
dc.contributor.author Pickering, A.
dc.contributor.author Scaroni, L.
dc.contributor.author Weisgrau, A. S.
dc.contributor.author Kahara, S. N.
dc.contributor.author Hernandez, K. B.
dc.contributor.author Paredes, E. J.
dc.contributor.author Lamping, J. E.
dc.contributor.author Nijamir, K.
dc.contributor.author Manamperi, J. P. J.
dc.contributor.author Kuruppuarachchi, K. A. J. M.
dc.contributor.author Madurapperuma, B. D.
dc.date.accessioned 2022-11-30T07:43:22Z
dc.date.available 2022-11-30T07:43:22Z
dc.date.issued 2022-11-15
dc.identifier.citation 11th Annual Science Research Sessions 2022 (ASRS-2022) Proceedings on "“Scientific Engagement for Sustainable Futuristic Innovations”. 15th November 2022. Faculty of Applied Sciences, South Eastern University of Sri Lanka, Sammanthurai, Sri Lanka. pp. 34. en_US
dc.identifier.isbn 978-624-5736-60-7
dc.identifier.uri http://ir.lib.seu.ac.lk/handle/123456789/6301
dc.description.abstract Recent advancements in small unmanned aerial systems (sUAS) have proved useful in monitoring and counting aquatic birds in wetlands flying over flocks without disturbing them. The objective of the study is to use a semi-automated workflow to extract waterfowl species and counts from a managed wetland in Colusa County, California. Over 560 UAV images were obtained using a DJI Mavic 2 PRO in a series of parallel flight lines at an average Ground Sample Distance (GSD) of approximately 3 cm/px. A rule-based feature extraction workflow in ENVI was used to extract waterfowl objects, using the Edge algorithm at a scale of 75% and the Full Schedule Lambda Merge algorithm at a level of 95%. An extent of waterfowl presence (6.8 ha) and waterfowl absence (1.4 ha) imagery was used for object-based image analysis (OBIA) and we counted approximately 2,259 birds. The overall classification accuracy for identifying birds was 57.3%. The user's accuracy for birds and non-birds was 93.9% and 51.5% and the producer’s accuracy for birds and non-birds was 23.6% and 98.1% respectively. The unique characteristics of our study site present challenges for conducting bird counts, which may require conducting both automated and manual counts in defined subsets of habitat. en_US
dc.language.iso en_US en_US
dc.publisher Faculty of Applied Sciences, South Eastern University of Sri Lanka, Sammanthurai. en_US
dc.subject Waterfowl en_US
dc.subject Central Valley en_US
dc.subject sUAS en_US
dc.title Bird counts in California’s central valley Wetlands using object-based image analysis en_US
dc.type Article en_US


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Search SEUIR


Advanced Search

Browse

My Account