Abstract:
Marriage holds immense significance in human life, representing one of the
foundational institutions of society. The initiation of marriage necessitates certain
prerequisites such as reaching the minimum age of adulthood, physical maturity,
and mental development. Many legal systems globally recognize the importance of
setting a minimum age for marriage, ensuring the well-being of both parties
involved. This legal age serves as a benchmark for boys and girls alike, ensuring
that they enter into marriage with the requisite maturity and understanding. In
unfortunate scenarios where girls under the age of sixteen are married and
subsequently face divorce, they encounter challenges in providing financial support
for themselves and their children. The Employment of Women, Young People, and
Children Law No. 1956 specifies the minimum age for employment as sixteen, with
hazardous work restricted until the age of eighteen. Consequently, these young girls
are unable to secure livelihoods due to legal restrictions on employment until they
reach the age of sixteen. This predicament often leads to a lack of education and
suitable employment opportunities for these girls. Additionally, Section 363(n) of
the Penal Code addresses the issue of sexual intercourse with minors. It deems any
sexual activity with a girl under the age of sixteen, and especially with a girl under
twelve, as statutory rape, regardless of consent. However, under the provisions of
the Muslim Marriage and Divorce Act (AMU), marital relations with a wife above
the age of twelve are not considered unlawful. This creates a contradiction between
the two laws, raising questions about the legal framework's coherence and
effectiveness. It is imperative for lawmakers to review and reconcile these
conflicting provisions within both legal frameworks. Addressing this incongruity is
essential to uphold the rights and well-being of minors and to ensure consistency
and fairness within the legal system.