Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://ir.lib.seu.ac.lk/handle/123456789/102
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorSivarajasingam, S
dc.contributor.authorBalamurali, N
dc.date.accessioned2015-07-24T09:05:42Z
dc.date.available2015-07-24T09:05:42Z
dc.date.issued10/1/2011
dc.identifier.citationJournal of Management. Volume VII. No. 1. pp 72-90. October 2011.
dc.identifier.issn1391-8230
dc.identifier.urihttp://ir.lib.seu.ac.lk/123456789/102
dc.description.abstractThis paper explores the empirical relationship between budget and current account deficits in the case of a small developing country, Sri Lanka for the period of 1960-2010. The data are collected from annual reports, Centra! Bank, Sri Lanka. The econometric methods used in this study are cointegration technique, Error correction modeling and Granger causality analysis. The empirical results are consistent with conventional view. Our empirical results clearly suggest that there exist statistically significant long-run positive relationship between the trade deficit and the budget deficit in Sri Lanka. The Granger causality test shows that the direction of causality runs from the budget deficit to the trade deficit and the relationship is positive and statistically significant. '••The empirical analysis in this study partially supports the Keynesian view that there is a linkage between the trade deficit and the budget deficit and the direction of causality is correct but the Ricardian equivalence hypothesis is not valid for Sri Lankan economy during the study period.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherFaculty of Management and Commerce South Eastern University of Sri Lanka Oluvil # 32360 Sri Lankaen_US
dc.subjectTwin deficiten_US
dc.subjectRicardian Equivalenceen_US
dc.subjectCo-integration error correction modelsen_US
dc.subjectGranger Causality testen_US
dc.titleAn empirical analysis of the twin deficits evidence from Sri Lankaen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
Appears in Collections:Volume 7. Issue.1

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
JOURNAL 2011-72.pdf610.71 kBAdobe PDFThumbnail
View/Open


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.