Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://ir.lib.seu.ac.lk/handle/123456789/2310
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorBenazeer, Jeylan-
dc.contributor.authorJariya, A.M. Inunn-
dc.date.accessioned2017-02-09T06:28:20Z-
dc.date.available2017-02-09T06:28:20Z-
dc.date.issued2013-04-09-
dc.identifier.citationFirst Undergraduate Colloquium. 09th April, 2013, South Eastern University of Sri Lanka, Oluvil, Sri Lanka, pp. 20-21.en_US
dc.identifier.isbn978-955-627-041-9-
dc.identifier.urihttp://ir.lib.seu.ac.lk/handle/123456789/2310-
dc.description.abstractThe banking sector is considered to be an important source of financing for most businesses in any economy. At present a lot o f countries around the world currently having dual banking system, as interest free banks are functioning parallel to conventional banks. Today the most familiar region of risk with Islamic and conventional banks is liquidity risk. There for this study was carried out as a comparative study. According to the problem statement, two research questions are developed to investigate this study. The first one is, " does Islamic bank ' s risk management practice differs from the conventional bank' s risk management practice ? " and the second is, what are the relationships between the determinants of liquidity risk and liquidity risk management practice?" And this study includes major two objectives. Comparison of the liquidity risk management of Islamic and convention a l banks in Sri Lanka f or the period 2008 - 2012 is one of the objectives and identification of the relationship and impact o f the Size of Financial Institution (SFI) , Networking Capital (NWC) , Return on Equity (ROE) , Capital Adequacy Ratio (CAR ) and Return on Asset (ROA) on the liquidity risk management of both Islamic and conventional banks in Sri Lanka is another objective. Three banks are selected for this study. One is from Islamic Banks and other two banks are from Conventiona l banks. Secondary data were used for this study. This secondary data are obtained from the web sites o f selected banks and their annual reports of 2008 - 2012 . To analyze the data and find out the result, Ratio Analysis , Correlation Analysis and Regression Analysis were used as a method of analysis. According to the findings of this study, in the case of Sri Lankan Banking Industry, there is different Liquidity Risk Management practice between is la mic and Conventional banks . Some determinants of Liquidity Risk impact on Liquidity Risk Management positively and some impact negatively. Even if there is a positive or negative relationship between dependent and independent variables, according to correlation analysis i f some Hypotheses are accepted that means there is a relationship between dependent and independent variables. If some Hypotheses are rejected that means there is no relationship between dependent a n d independent variables According to this study Liquidity Risk Management practice of Islamic Bank is poorer than Liquidity Risk Management practice of Conventional Banks in Sri Lankan . This research will guide for future researches and future researchers.en_US
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.publisherFaculty of Islamic Studies and Arabic Language, South Eastern University of Sri Lankaen_US
dc.subjectRisk managementen_US
dc.subjectSri Lankaen_US
dc.subjectIslamic banken_US
dc.titleLiquidity risk management in Islamic and conventional banks in Sri Lanka: a comparative studyen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
Appears in Collections:FIA Colloquium 2013

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
ABSTRACTS 9TH APRIL 2013-12.pdf48.44 kBAdobe PDFThumbnail
View/Open


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.