Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://ir.lib.seu.ac.lk/handle/123456789/5504
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorKanesarajah, K.-
dc.date.accessioned2021-05-11T06:48:20Z-
dc.date.available2021-05-11T06:48:20Z-
dc.date.issued2021-01-19-
dc.identifier.citation9th South Eastern University International Arts Research Symposium - SEUIARS 2020 on "Global Dimension of Social Sciences and Humanities through Research and Innovation”. 19th January 2021. South Eastern University of Sri Lanka, Oluvil, Sri Lanka. pp. 85.en_US
dc.identifier.issn978-955-627-253-6-
dc.identifier.urihttp://ir.lib.seu.ac.lk/handle/123456789/5504-
dc.description.abstractPhilosophy is a vast and mother subject to all. It deals with many areas. The philosophy of education is one of the important ones. Educational Philosophers have indicated some educational thoughts. One educational thought is differing from another. Comparative thinking has developed into one of the most important aspects of the history of comparative thought. Comparative thought means the process of comparing two thoughts and analyses the similarities and differences between them. The word education has an in-depth meaning. The term ’Education’ has been derived from the Latin term ’Educatum’. which means the act of teaching or training? A group of educationists says that it has come from another Latin word ‘Educare’ means ‘to bring up’ or ‘to rise’ which also means "uncovering the inner being". That is, "education is to mound the intellect that is inside the child". The philosophy of education is to investigate questions such as what is education? What are the principles of education? What kind of educational theory is best? Defining education is not easy. A number of theories were advanced in Western thought, from Socrates to Karl Marx. Similarly, in the eastern world scholars from Yakkiyavaller to Vipullandhar has proposed many educational theories. Thus, this study is based on a comparison between Karl Marx’s and Swami Vipullandher's educational ideas. Karl Marx and Vipullandher are contemporary scholars, but both are having different philosophies. Specially Marx is a materialist and also Vipullandher is an idealist. The co-objectives of this research are to identify the nature and the consequence of both theories. The data and information for this explanatory research-based, historical approach were obtained on the basis of primary and secondary data collection. Secondary data, the book published in related to this topic. Magazines, research articles, newspapers, and publication in the internet was treated as secondary data for this research.en_US
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.publisherFaculty of Arts and Culture, South Eastern University of Sri Lankaen_US
dc.subjectPhilosophyen_US
dc.subjectEducationen_US
dc.subjectAnalyticsen_US
dc.subjectMaterialismen_US
dc.subjectEthicsen_US
dc.subjectSpiritualityen_US
dc.titleVipullandhar’s and Karl Marx’s educational thoughts: a comparative studyen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
Appears in Collections:SEUIARS - 2020

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Vipullandhar’s and Karl Marx’s - p.85.pdf165.92 kBAdobe PDFThumbnail
View/Open


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.