Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://ir.lib.seu.ac.lk/handle/123456789/6301
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorFisher, J.-
dc.contributor.authorMarlin, K.-
dc.contributor.authorPickering, A.-
dc.contributor.authorScaroni, L.-
dc.contributor.authorWeisgrau, A. S.-
dc.contributor.authorKahara, S. N.-
dc.contributor.authorHernandez, K. B.-
dc.contributor.authorParedes, E. J.-
dc.contributor.authorLamping, J. E.-
dc.contributor.authorNijamir, K.-
dc.contributor.authorManamperi, J. P. J.-
dc.contributor.authorKuruppuarachchi, K. A. J. M.-
dc.contributor.authorMadurapperuma, B. D.-
dc.date.accessioned2022-11-30T07:43:22Z-
dc.date.available2022-11-30T07:43:22Z-
dc.date.issued2022-11-15-
dc.identifier.citation11th Annual Science Research Sessions 2022 (ASRS-2022) Proceedings on "“Scientific Engagement for Sustainable Futuristic Innovations”. 15th November 2022. Faculty of Applied Sciences, South Eastern University of Sri Lanka, Sammanthurai, Sri Lanka. pp. 34.en_US
dc.identifier.isbn978-624-5736-60-7-
dc.identifier.urihttp://ir.lib.seu.ac.lk/handle/123456789/6301-
dc.description.abstractRecent advancements in small unmanned aerial systems (sUAS) have proved useful in monitoring and counting aquatic birds in wetlands flying over flocks without disturbing them. The objective of the study is to use a semi-automated workflow to extract waterfowl species and counts from a managed wetland in Colusa County, California. Over 560 UAV images were obtained using a DJI Mavic 2 PRO in a series of parallel flight lines at an average Ground Sample Distance (GSD) of approximately 3 cm/px. A rule-based feature extraction workflow in ENVI was used to extract waterfowl objects, using the Edge algorithm at a scale of 75% and the Full Schedule Lambda Merge algorithm at a level of 95%. An extent of waterfowl presence (6.8 ha) and waterfowl absence (1.4 ha) imagery was used for object-based image analysis (OBIA) and we counted approximately 2,259 birds. The overall classification accuracy for identifying birds was 57.3%. The user's accuracy for birds and non-birds was 93.9% and 51.5% and the producer’s accuracy for birds and non-birds was 23.6% and 98.1% respectively. The unique characteristics of our study site present challenges for conducting bird counts, which may require conducting both automated and manual counts in defined subsets of habitat.en_US
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.publisherFaculty of Applied Sciences, South Eastern University of Sri Lanka, Sammanthurai.en_US
dc.subjectWaterfowlen_US
dc.subjectCentral Valleyen_US
dc.subjectsUASen_US
dc.titleBird counts in California’s central valley Wetlands using object-based image analysisen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
Appears in Collections:11th Annual Science Research Session - FAS

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Proceedings ASRS-2022 final-58.pdf206.01 kBAdobe PDFThumbnail
View/Open


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.